Volume 20, Number 40 | The Newspaper of Lower Manhattan | January 5 - 11, 2011
City Dept of Education not buying into new enviromental standards
BY Aline Reynolds
The city Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency are at odds concerning recent discussions over eliminating possible airborne toxins from public schools.
The E.P.A. released guidelines last Wednesday for the safe and immediate removal of polychlorinated biphenyls from lighting ballasts in school buildings. The city D.O.E., though, is not quite ready to jump on board with the program and is specifically questioning the urgency of the E.P.A.’s claims.
In a recent letter to Dennis Walcott, the city’s deputy mayor for education, the E.P.A. recommended that all P.C.B.-containing lighting fixtures be removed in a safe and “expedited” fashion. It hopes to schedule school inspections in the coming months with the D.O.E.’s help, according to Judith Enck, the E.P.A.’s regional administrator. Enck also suggested that the D.O.E. create a working group to produce a written strategy plan by March 15, 2011.
In response to Enck’s letter, Walcott said a wholesale replacement of ballasts is “an inadequately informed risk management strategy.”
The chemicals, used as insulators in school buildings prior to 1979, are toxic and pose long-term health threats to students, teachers and staff, according to medical reports.
The E.P.A. and the D.O.E. co-launched a pilot program last year, testing P.C.B. levels in five schools around the city. Three of the schools had broken lighting ballasts, which, if not properly dismantled, can cause the noxious chemicals to seep into the air.
Walcott also questioned the E.P.A.’s scientific assessment of the pilot program, arguing that health studies have not tied the P.C.B. levels with direct health effects among students or staff.
“Available health literature suggests that the theoretical risk of health impacts is too low from this exposure… to justify a public health-driven intervention to immediately remove all P.C.B.-containing ballasts in all New York City public schools,” Walcott wrote. Limiting P.C.B. exposure, therefore, merits “a more thoughtful and careful evaluation of realistic risk management strategies,” he said.
Replacing the lighting ballasts in the nearly 800 public school buildings that are potentially contaminated, Walcott explained, would amount to $1 billion and would require “unprecedented” amounts of supervision and manpower. The steep investment, he said, could result in staff layoffs, a loss of educational programs and an annulment of school construction projects around the city.
“We believe that this discussion should include federal funding to allay the vast financial burdens on the city of such an initiative,” Walcott said.
Nineteen schools in the Downtown area were built prior to 1979 and are therefore at risk of P.C.B. contamination, according to data collected by Communities for Change, a citywide organization representing low-income families.
“We saw what happened with lead and paint — we decided we had to be a part of finding a solution to this,” said Jonathan Westin, president of Communities for Change.
“Parents are really concerned about the future of their children’s health,” said ALord Allah, chairman of the District 1 Parent Advisory Council.
Allah has been educating Lower East Side schools about the dangerous toxins since last fall. He distributed petitions to L.E.S. parents and teachers, requesting their schools be tested for P.C.B.s. Communities for Change and New York Lawyers for the Public Interest then sent the petitions to the D.O.E. and E.P.A.
The city, however, might have to comply with the E.P.A.’s initiative in order to avoid federal penalties. Failing lighting ballasts, according to Enck, puts the city at “substantial risk under the [Toxic Substances Control Act].”
As for the costs, the E.P.A. said that new lighting fixtures will pay for themselves in long-term energy savings. The city is also eligible for federal bonds, according to the E.P.A., that would help finance the plan.
Congressman Jerrold Nadler, along with New York Representatives Jose Serrano and Joseph Crowley, recently introduced the Safe Schools, Healthy Kids Act, a new law that would set up a federal grant program to finance P.C.B. cleanup in schools.
“We welcome these guidelines for the aggressive and comprehensive abatement of lighting ballasts under the oversight of the E.P.A., and we renew our call on New York City’s Department of Education to step up its testing and remediation program,” Nadler and Crowley said in a joint statement.
Nadler formed a citywide coalition last October, urging the E.P.A. to take immediate action. He said he plans to work with schools and communities Downtown and citywide in an effort to do away with the toxins.
Long-term exposure to the chemicals can cause cancer, immune disorders and hormonal imbalances in children, according to Dr. Warren Licht, chief medical officer at Downtown Hospital. He stressed, however, that they’re only dangerous if they become airborne. “If it’s sitting idle in a wall somewhere without being disturbed,” he said, “I wouldn’t worry about it.”
P.C.B.s were once widely used to insulate electrical equipment since they are non-explosive and have a high tolerance for heat. The E.P.A. banned their distribution in 1979, however, after learning about their health effects.