Volume 16, Number 9 | July 29–Aug. 4, 2003


Trust knocked on Pier 40, Yankee Ferry

By Lincoln Anderson

Downtown Express photo by Elisabeth Robert

Ship keepers of the Yankee Ferry, an historic ship that has been docked for the last 12 years at Pier 25 at N. Moore St. in Tribeca, may have to move off the vessel because of the Hudson River Park Trust’s vote last week.

A plan for interim recreational uses for Pier 40 will be presented to the Hudson River Park Trust’s board of directors in “a month or so,” reported Robert Balachandran, the Trust’s president, at the agency’s board meeting last Thursday.

By the end of August or beginning of September, the Trust’s staff will be ready to show the board of directors some plans, said Balachandran. Balachandran has previously said these uses will include athletic fields to the greatest extent possible. He did not say how long it would take to complete construction of the interim plan for the Houston St. pier.

Current uses on the pier that do not conform with the Hudson River Park Act, such as FedEx, Academy bus and the Police Department’s Barrier Unit, will have to vacate the pier by the end of the year. Balachandran also said a request for proposals to operate the parking on the pier will be issued. For the last seven years, C&K Properties’ partners Ben Korman and Meier Cohen have held the master lease for the pier and operated the parking. C&K currently generates $4.5 million annually in revenue for the Trust.

Former state Senator Franz Leichter, a board of directors member, speaking via a phone hookup from Washington, D.C., questioned the process by which the Trust decided on June 9 not to pick any of several competing private developers’ plans for the pier, but instead develop the pier with interim recreational and park uses and put the project out for bid again in a few years.

“I’m concerned that decisions have been made on Pier 40 that were not done in an open way,” Leichter said. “We need to take this up at one of our board meetings in an open manner.”

Julie Nadel, another board member, added, “Where was the board’s action? This is a fairly significant non-action by the board. How much money are we going to spend on this interim plan?”

Balachandran said they don’t know the project’s cost right now, but that consultants are studying this. He said that at one point or another, all the board members including Nadel and Leichter had discussions either with him or James Ortenzio, the board’s former chairperson, regarding the decision not to pick a developer right now for Pier 40.

After these discussions, “There was a small meeting, and they made the decision,” Balachandran said. “Believe me, this wasn’t something that was ordered by Robert Balachandran,” he added. “It was done with the chairperson.”

Leichter continued to urge that the matter needs to be “brought in a formal manner before the board of directors.”

Meanwhile, Lawrence Goldberg, president of the Hudson River Park Advisory Council, in his remarks to the board, called the Pier 40 process “a failure.”

“It was mandated to have a developer and we don’t have a developer,” Goldberg said. “The fact that we’re not going to [develop the pier] and we’re starting again with interim uses is a failure.”

Under an amendment to the Hudson River Park Act, the Trust was supposed to pick a developer by the deadline of June 15.

However, Joe Rose, a board of directors member and a member of the City Planning Commission, said, “To pick the wrong developer would be more problematic than not picking any developer.” Rose said the board didn’t want to be “locked into something that was less than optimal. I don’t think we felt comfortable [rushing to meet] what seemed like an artificial constraint.”

Some critics of the Trust’s action on Pier 40 say the Trust will be hard pressed to find a new developer willing to invest in architects and consultants again since the agency rejected all of the plans submitted this time.

In other park matters, there will be tennis in about a month in Hudson River Park but not tenants (as in ship keepers) any time soon, and possibly never. The directors voted to approve three new tennis courts to be built in the park at Spring St., west of the West Side Highway. They also voted to approve guidelines for docking historic vessels in the park, including a prohibition against ship keepers living onboard.

The Lower Manhattan Development Corp., which had already authorized money for the tennis courts project before it was voted on by the Trust, will reimburse the cost of building them. There will be one single and two double courts. The work is scheduled to finish by the end of the summer, with the tennis season extending into November if the weather holds.

The project was put out to bid and a contract was awarded for $560,000, not to exceed $616,000. The courts would be asphalt with a thin, rubberized surface. It wasn’t immediately clear if the courts would be free to use, but previously courts adjacent to Battery Park City that were on Trust property but administered by the B.P.C. Parks Conservancy were free to use on a first-come-first-served basis with a one-hour limit.

There was a lengthy discussion on whether the amount was too much to spend on three tennis courts that will be interim and probably demolished after only two or three years to allow construction of the Hudson River Park’s Segment 3. Currently, the area is barren blacktop.

Board member Bernadette Castro, state Parks commissioner, conveyed the thoughts of board member Madelyn Wils, chairperson of Lower Manhattan’s Community Board 1 and a member of the L.M.D.C., who was out of town. According to Castro, Wils felt it would be “more prudent” to locate the tennis courts on Pier 40 at Houston St., where they would have “five seasons” or five years before a permanent plan is finished on Pier 40.

Others were more concerned about the project’s cost. Georgette Mosbacher, another Trust board member and a top Republican fundraiser, said, “We’re going to spend $600,000 on three tennis courts that will only last three years? I find that absolutely staggering.”

However, Trip Dorkey, the Trust’s new chairperson, said the mayor and the governor had approved the money through the L.M.D.C. in order to help Downtown recreation.

“If we don’t take this money, they could take it back, consider other uses,” Dorkey noted. “I hate to say it’s other people’s money, but it’s other people’s money.” He also said that the governor had put out a press release on the tennis courts. Dorkey also downplayed the construction cost, noting, “It’ll work out to less than $1 per person” who plays tennis on the courts.

Balachandran said they had made “great strides” in Soho and Tribeca, in Segment 3, in terms of recreational uses, including the new batting cages and a skateboard park at N. Moore St. There is also a new full-length basketball court just north of Chambers St. An ice-skating rink, paid for by the L.M.D.C., will be coming to the park near N. Moore St. in the winter. Balachandran said putting the tennis courts on Pier 40 could complicate matters in the development of interim recreational space on the pier.

“I would hate to muddy that water,” Balachandran said.

Added Dorkey, putting the courts on the pier “commits us to doing something we may or may not want to do on Pier 40.”

Leichter said he thought the cost was “very high for a limited use” and that he would oppose it if it were the Trust’s money and wondered if there had been any thought given to a bubble for winter use.

Teddy Roosevelt, IV, a director and the great-grandson of the former Republican president, said he didn’t want to “embarrass” the governor by turning down the funds. Mosbacher said she didn’t realize a press release had been issued. In the end, the board voted to approve the tennis courts for Spring St.

The Trust also voted to approve guidelines for berthing historic boats in the park. The guidelines keep with the Hudson River Park Act, which forbids residential use of the park, in that people will not be allowed to live on the boats docked on a long-term basis at piers in the park.

Piers slated for historic vessels include Pier 25 at N. Moore St. in Tribeca, Pier 54 at W. 13th St. and Pier 97 at W. 57th St. at the north end of Hudson River Park.

Nadel, noting it was an “issue close to my heart,” said she felt the guidelines need more review and that as is they will adversely affect historic ships in the park. Nadel wants ship keepers to be allowed to live on at least some of the ships, as is done for the three ships at South St. Seaport. A ship keeper also lives near the Intrepid Air Space Museum, she noted. However, the guidelines don’t allow anyone to live on historic ships in the park, other than the crews of historic ships that are visiting, who can stay in the park for up to six months.

Nadel said it’s necessary for the ships’ protection to have ship keepers, and that for a waterfront park things should be done to encourage the docking of historic ships.

“We don’t want houseboats, but a ship is not something you can just lock up and leave for the night,” she said.

Dorkey said they are “guidelines, not rules” and that there is some leeway, but stressed that, “One of the clear mandates of this Trust is no residences in the park.”

Balachandran said the issue has been “vexing” and was something that legislators went “around and around and around on” in Albany when the Hudson River Park Act was drafted six years ago.

“As a general provision, we do echo what’s said in the Hudson River Park Act about living in the park,” he said, adding that situations like a boiler blowing up and the like could call for someone being on board a ship to repair it or safeguard it.

Laurie Silberfeld, the Trust’s counsel, said that Mystic Seaport in Connecticut and San Diego, two places with historic ships, do not have shipkeepers.

“That’s fairly persuasive evidence to me,” said Roosevelt.

Jimmy Gallagher, who owns and lives on the Yankee Ferry on Pier 25, in a telephone interview, said the Connecticut comparison is false because there are so many historic vessels in Mystic that it is economical to hire a staff to regularly check on boats, but it is hard to do that if only a few historic ships are docked in Tribeca.

“I just hope this isn’t part of a plan to drive the Yankee out,” Gallagher said. The Yankee, close to 100 years old, was armed during World Wars I and II although it did not see combat and it also helped shuttle new immigrants from Ellis Island to Lower Manhattan.

Silberfeld said a caveat could be put in the guidelines to allow ship keepers to be on board in bad weather or for maintenance or programs for overnight stays.

The board also voted to extend their contract with Cornell University and fund the second year of a planned two-year assessment study on the environmental impact on the Hudson River from the World Trade Center’s fallout and dredging at Pier 25 for the debris barge. The impact on fish and shellfish is being studied around the dredged area compared with the rest of the park.

Leichter said the Port Authority should fund the study, but Roosevelt disagreed, noting, “I think any group that has a fiduciary interest in managing a park has to know what is there. Irrespective of whether Sept. 11 took place, we need a baseline inventory.”

The board voted to approve funding the study but Dorkey said he’d also look into getting reimbursement for it.



Downtown Express is published by
Community Media LLC.

Downtown Express | 487 Greenwich St., Suite 6A | New York, NY 10013

Phone: 212.242.6162 | Fax: 212.229.2970
Email: editor@downtownexpress.com

Written permission of the publisher must be obtainedbefore any of the contents of this newspaper, in whole or in part, can be reproduced or redistributed.