S.O.S., Seaport Museum says it’s getting pushed out

The lightship Ambrose after it was repaired last year. Downtown Express file photo by Terese Loeb Kreuzer

The lightship Ambrose after it was repaired last year. Downtown Express file photo by Terese Loeb Kreuzer

BY TERESE LOEB KREUZER |  At Community Board 1’s Seaport Committee meeting on April 16, Jerry Gallagher, general manager of the South Street Seaport Museum, said that the museum only has enough money to carry it through the end of June. He also accused The Howard Hughes Corporation, which has a 60-year lease on much of the South Street Seaport property, of deliberately trying to put the museum out of business.

The Museum of the City of New York has been managing the Seaport Museum since 2011. Its 18-month contract expired on April 5 but was renewed for three months in order to provide one last chance to salvage the museum.
The museum was on the road to curatorial and financial stability when Superstorm Sandy struck, severely damaging the electrical systems in the museum’s Fulton St. premises. The heating and cooling systems and the elevator and escalators would cost an estimated $22 million to repair.

On April 7, the museum closed its 12 Fulton St. galleries, with the intention of focusing on its properties on Water St. where Bowne Printers and Bowne & Co. Stationers are located.

“From our perspective, Howard Hughes’ actions to date signify that the museum will not likely survive and that The Howard Hughes Corporation doesn’t seem to have an interest in our survival,” Gallagher said.

He cited specific roadblocks that the corporation had erected to keeping the museum’s historic ships at Pier 16. He said that the museum had asked Howard Hughes to help support the ships, which, he said, “give authenticity to Pier 17” where the firm is about to demolish the existing mall and build another one.

However, Gallagher said David Weinreb, the Hughes C.E.O., responded that he would pay $150,000 annually for 10 years to the ships if the museum would give up its leasehold interests along Water St.

“We obviously were not asking for a trade that would benefit The Howard Hughes Corporation at the expense of the Seaport Museum,” Gallagher said. He said in a subsequent meeting with City Councilmemeber Margaret Chin and Chris Curry, senior executive vice president of Howard Hughes, Curry “was kind enough to say that he would reverse David Weinreb’s decision,” suggesting the $1.5 million offer would come without strings, “but nothing has happened with regard to that request.”

Gallagher also cited problems created for the museum by a lease dating from 1981 that was originally between the New York City Economic Development Corporation (E.D.C.) and the Rouse Company. That lease then was transferred to General Growth Properties and to its successor, Howard Hughes.

“Howard Hughes has no reason to help secure the museum’s existence because they would get the [museum’s] square footage as a matter of right under the 1981 lease after six months of vacancy,” Gallagher said. “So if the museum doesn’t utilize its spaces for six months, then by default it gets turned over to the Howard Hughes Corporation. They would acquire all of the spaces within the museum at 12 Fulton St. and also the spaces along Water Street.”

This would amount to over 80,000 square feet of space.

“Howard Hughes Corporation has twice asked my permission to walk through the spaces with one of their architects,” Gallagher told the Seaport Committee. “We’re doing everything in our power to make this work, but in fact we have close to no winning cards in our hands. It’s a very dire situation that we’re faced with.”

Curry responded that Gallagher was telling only part of the story.

“I think it’s important to note that this is primarily a negotiation between E.D.C. and the Seaport Museum,” he said. “We were brought into this because they’re our neighbor and they were asking for certain things that would impact our leasehold interests and we were clear that we wouldn’t give up our leasehold interests but we would work with them.”

Curry said that Howard Hughes had given the museum “many opportunities to work with us to figure out how to become much more visible within our program.” He went on to say that, “The issues with the South Street Seaport Museum are much too large for the Howard Hughes Corporation to solve. But we’re ready, willing and able to help in any way we can.”

Matt Viggiano, land use director for City Councilmember Chin in whose district the South Street Seaport lies, said that Chin is “dedicated to making sure that the museum remains a community asset.” He said, “We’re working very closely with E.D.C. as well as with the Department of Cultural Affairs to make that happen.”

Although no one from the E.D.C. was present at the Seaport Committee meeting, a spokesperson said in response that E.D.C. is in daily contact with the museum to address their needs. The spokesperson, Nick Kelly, also said that as the landlord, the E.D.C. is responsible for fixing building systems that are not exclusive to just one building — such as electrical systems that provide electricity for a number of tenants. Kelly said E.D.C. had fixed the electrical system and relocated it to a higher floor and had repaired the museum’s cooling and heating systems, though not obligated to do so.

In an email April 18, Susan Henshaw Jones, president of the museum, said E.D.C. had fixed the switchgear that provides electricity to the collections, which are in a building that faces John St. “Thus, we were able to turn on the chillers,” she said. “It was done this week, in fact, so the collections are fine. E.D.C. should be commended for getting the collection areas fixed up in advance of the heat and humidity. Our temporary heaters warmed them, and now the chillers will cool and de-humidify them.”

John Fratta, chairperson of the Seaport Committee, suggested setting up a meeting with the Hughes Corporation, the Seaport Museum and E.D.C. “so we can really get the story. We’re hearing it from you, we’re hearing it from them, and we’re hearing it from E.D.C. and nothing is making sense,” he said. “We can’t afford to lose the museum. We’ve made that very clear from day 1.”

Gallagher and Curry agreed to such a meeting. The E.D.C. has said that it is always happy to talk with the community board.

Jerry Gallagher, general manager of the South Street Seaport Museum, making a presentation to Community Board 1′s Seaport Committee on April 16. Downtown Express photos by Terese Loeb Kreuzer.

 

Matt Viggiano, director of land use for City Councilmember Margaret Chin, left, and Christopher Curry, senior executive vice president of The Howard Hughes Corporation, conferred at the Community Board 1 meeting April 16.

Spread the word:

6 Responses to S.O.S., Seaport Museum says it’s getting pushed out

  1. You guys had "A Trojan Horse" dropped into your "Community" You and Fratta are begging for mercy now, to late, as you are about to be put to the sword as we old tenants of the Pier were.

    Look at the picture of Curry and His city buddy, practically making love.

    You've been had.

    • Truth to Power

      “Look at the picture of Curry and His city buddy, practically making love. ”

      Yeah, Chin’s staffer.

      Just like the photo in the downtown express two weeks ago of chin being congratulated by a lobbyist at the city Council after her vote to give the Seaport over to Howard Hughes.

      Anyone But Chin = ABC

  2. I visited the Seaport Museum during my 2012 trip to New York, and I would be greatly dismayed to think it is going to disappear from the waterfront area where it clearly makes sense to locate it. The same can be said for the few remaining ships that are berthed at Pier 17.

    This area was one of my favorite places to hang out after a long day out and about in the city, and on all of my three visits to New York, I frequently found myself sitting at the end of the Pier 17 Mall watching as the evening sun cast golden rays on the buildings in Brooklyn.

    By all means rebuild the mall, but for the city’s sake, keep the Seaport Museum, the ships, and the stunning views.

    Jim

    Adelaide, Australia.

  3. I actually blog also and I am authoring something similar to this
    post, “S.O.S., Seaport Museum says it

  4. It is inconceivable that Councilmember Chin can or will do anything to save the museum. And if Howard Hughes Corporation benefits from the departure of the museum, there is no way in h— the museum will remain. Follow the money.

  5. Unfortunate and shortsighted. The Museum is a local and tourist magnet that drives traffic to the the Seaport and would help merchants and businesses.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


4 + = ten

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>